Skip to content
Loxley
back to the marketplace

REASONER · OPEN · moderate

FilingDeltaReader

lox:0xc219 · published by erc8004:0x63dd…

Diffs a 10-Q against the last one and summarises what changed. Useful; the edge it adds has been thin.

(context) → rationale

In plain words: DSR is how sure the protocol is that the edge is real, P is whether it held up in the second half of the record, R combines both with what the script has actually earned, and N and T say how many variants were tried and how much live record there is to judge.

0.84
0.55
-0.21
80
38
21
$89one-time · yours forever

forward-only track record

Everything below is computed from attested traces since this script was minted. A publisher may attach a backtest to the manifest; it never enters the score. The mint is a hard rule on the chart, and there is nothing to its left.

cumulative attributed alpha$3.6K
01k2k3k4kMINTEPOCH SINCE MINTUSD

Manifest

LIP-1 · immutable
{
  "lip": 1,
  "class": "REASONER",
  "id": "lox:0xc219",
  "publisher": "erc8004:0x63dd…",
  "code_hash": "keccak256(wasm_module)",
  "runtime": "wasm-1.2",
  "inputs": [
    {
      "feed": "rh:nbbo:equities",
      "lag_ms": 0
    },
    {
      "artifact": "lox:0x9b60",
      "share_bps": 831
    },
    {
      "artifact": "lox:0x3a52",
      "share_bps": 829
    }
  ],
  "outputs": {
    "schema": "order_intent_v2"
  },
  "determinism": "none",
  "capacity": null,
  "pricing": {
    "model": "one_time_licence",
    "price_usd": 89,
    "licence": "erc1155",
    "transferable": true
  },
  "verification_surcharge_bps": 278,
  "risk_class": "moderate",
  "disclosure_hash": "keccak256(risk_disclosure.pdf)"
}
code_hash
Anchors the module. If the code changes, the id changes: a script is never silently mutated under its owners. An update is a new script with a supersedes link, and the owner has to consent to migrate.
inputs.artifact
A declared dependency on another script, with the revenue share passed upstream. Depth is capped at 4 and the cumulative upstream share at 5,000 bps, so the publisher always keeps at least half.
pricing
The whole cost model, in one object: a price in dollars, charged once, and a transferable ERC-1155 licence. No epoch, no access fee, no cut of what the script earns you — the fields that used to carry those are gone.

φ per epoch

epochφcumulative
1+107$107
2+83$189.8
3+163$352.7
4+157$509.5
5+228$737.9
6+134$871.8
7+56$927.5
8+70$997.7
9+217$1.2K
10+60$1.3K
11+92$1.4K
12+186$1.6K
13+107$1.7K
14+201$1.9K
15+208$2.1K
16+159$2.2K
17+112$2.3K
18+143$2.5K
19+146$2.6K
20+146$2.8K
21+182$3K
22+101$3.1K
23+46$3.1K
24+57$3.2K
25+55$3.2K
26+62$3.3K
27+233$3.5K
28+123$3.6K

Dependency graph

1 660

upstream — this script pays them

downstream — they pay this script

max depth4
publisher keeps83

Publisher bond

intact
posted$0
required$0
slashed$0

S ≥ β·c_max·p₀ with β = 5%. Enough to make over-declaring capacity expensive, low enough not to shut out an independent quant.

Incident log

1
  1. challenge lost · epoch 19

    A replay produced a different output hash; the bond was slashed in full

seeded script · every figure is illustrative and internally consistent